Patty Jenkins responds to controversial Surprise Girl 1984 plot level


Surprise Girl (Gal Gadot) and Steve Trevor (Chris Pine) collectively once more in Surprise Girl 1984.


Clay Enos/Warner Bros. Photos

WARNING SPOILERS AHEAD

Whether or not you love or hate Wonder Woman 1984 (at present taking part in in choose theaters and accessible to stream on HBO Max) one factor’s for certain — Steve Trevor (performed by Chris Pine) getting back from the useless is a weird twist.

In any case, when Steve died on the finish of 2017’s Wonder Woman movie — a narrative set nearly 70 years earlier than 1984 — followers might need been confused how he not solely survived his loss of life but additionally by no means aged. 

Now Surprise Girl 1984 director Patty Jenkins is defending the controversial option to convey his character again into Diana Prince/Surprise Girl’s life for the brand new film.

The Surprise Girl 1984 plot revolves round a particular artifact referred to as the Dreamstone that has the ability to grant one want for whoever holds it — form of just like the horror story idea of the magical Monkey’s Paw. While you want for one thing, there’s all the time some strings hooked up.

In any case, it was the God of Lies who gave the stone its energy within the first place. When the Dreamstone grants a want, it then takes one thing else of equal significance from the wisher. Nevertheless, earlier than totally understanding the devious quid professional quo nature of the stone, Diana Prince/Surprise Girl (Gal Gadot) needs for the return of Steve and, the subsequent day, he returns. 

rev-1-ww84-27173rv2-high-res-jpeg

Steve Trevor (Chirs Pine) is not who you may assume he’s in Surprise Girl 1984.


Clay Enos/Warner Bros. Photos

However here is the place it will get difficult within the film. Steve is not precisely the identical man she remembers from her previous. The truth is, Steve has mainly taken over the physique of somebody who already exists. And he did not get consent first both. Additionally, simply to make it additional complicated, Steve appears like this completely different particular person (performed by actor Kristoffer Polaha) to everybody else. 

One other very problematic level right here is that if Steve is not actually Steve, meaning Surprise Girl is probably getting bodily with a stranger and never her beloved Steve. Although within the film it is implied, there is not any precise intercourse scene between the 2 characters.

The dearth of consent is what received loads of followers up in arms concerning the film. Jenkins could possibly be merely taking part in with that well-known story trope of characters body-swapping as within the films Big and Freaky Friday, the place consent is just not given. 

This “body-swapping with out character consent” plot system has been utilized in films, TV reveals, comics and video video games for many years, and particularly prevalent in leisure from the ’80s. However that is an period the place that outdated body-swapping with out consent plot system won’t be as politically appropriate because it as soon as was.

A fan named Dustin Philipson on Twitter came to Jenkins’ defense concerning the body-swapping in Surprise Girl 1984 saying that not solely is that this a typical plot system in fiction, but additionally on this explicit story the body-swapping was “undone” when folks took again their needs.

Whereas Jenkins didn’t supply any further perception into the plot system utilized in Surprise Girl 1984, she did agree with the fan tweet by responding with “Hahaha. Precisely @DustyDontShoot!!” 

It will have been extra perfect for Jenkins to supply extra of her personal ideas concerning the body-swap system, however for now, this can function some clarification for the shortage of consent throughout bodyswaps.

As anticipated, some followers responded to Jenkins’ retweet with their very own theories.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *