| Mumbai |
Up to date: October 14, 2020 4:23:14 pm
THE INDIAN cricket board is going through questions from a gamers’ consultant within the Apex Council, which was arrange by the Supreme Courtroom to supervise the sport, over insufficient communication, apathy in addressing welfare calls for and failure to share minutes of conferences held over two months, The Indian Express has learnt. Sources stated that in an e-mail despatched days earlier than the Council’s subsequent assembly Saturday, former India opener Anshuman Gaekwad additionally questioned the dearth of IPL invites for all its members. On the similar time, he wrote, it was “eye-pleasing” to see the BCCI’s office-bearers within the UAE watching the IPL.
A BCCI office-bearer confirmed to The Indian Specific that the Board has obtained Gaekwad’s mail. Gaekwad, who represents the Indian Cricketers’ Affiliation (ICA) on the Council together with former girls’s captain Shantha Rangaswamy, didn’t reply to telephone calls and textual content messages looking for remark. In his e-mail, Gaekwad wrote that BCCI office-bearers haven’t replied to letters despatched by the ICA.
When contacted, ICA president and former Take a look at batsman Ashok Malhotra stated: “We’ve written thrice to BCCI president Sourav Ganguly, secretary Jay Shah and treasurer Arun Dhumal however are but to get a reply. There are some calls for that we would like the Board to think about, like rising pension, elevating medical insurance coverage from Rs 5 lakh to Rs 10 lakh, and giving pension to widows of first-class cricketers. We wish pension for gamers who’ve performed 10-24 first-class video games. To date, no choice has been taken on any of those points and there was no reply to our mails.”
The ICA has additionally requested for launch of the benevolent fund of former India all-rounder Manoj Prabhakar, who returned to the sport as a coach after a ban on alleged match-fixing fees. Malhotra stated the ICA’s two representatives are “following up” on these points.
Primarily based on Justice R M Lodha’s suggestions, which subsequently grew to become a part of a Supreme Courtroom order, the Apex Council contains BCCI office-bearers, a state unit nominee, men and women gamers’ representatives, and a nominee of the Comptroller and Auditor Normal of India (CAG).
At the moment, former India captain Ganguly, Shah and Dhumal are among the many BCCI office-bearers on the Council.
BCCI sources stated Gaekwad’s e-mail has raised “very pertinent factors” in regards to the lack of transparency in cricket administration and signifies how Ganguly’s presence “hasn’t actually empowered the gamers”.
In his mail, Gaekwad stated he’s conscious that BCCI office-bearers have the “mandate to take day-to-day selections”, and in regards to the pressures they face whereas taking essential calls concerning the IPL and different cricket engagements.
Nonetheless, he wrote that by preserving the Apex Council at the hours of darkness, the office-bearers have put its members in an embarrassing state of affairs, particularly when the media, state models and cricketers ask them about key points.
The previous Baroda participant, who represented the nation in 40 Exams and 15 ODIs within the Seventies and Nineteen Eighties, stated that for the reason that gamers’ representatives have been elected by over 1,500 cricketers, and never simply by the state models, they’ve a accountability to maintain them knowledgeable about points associated to their welfare.
The members’ ignorance doesn’t paint a very good impression in regards to the functioning of the Council, wrote Gaekwad.
? The Indian Specific is now on Telegram. Click on here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and keep up to date with the newest headlines
© The Indian Specific (P) Ltd